Tuesday, August 20, 2019
An Analysis of Babi Yar :: Babi Yar Essays
    An Analysis of Babi Yar         Yevtushenko speaks in first person throughout the poem. This     creates the tone of him being in the shoes of the Jews. As he says in     lines 63-64, "No Jewish blood is mixed in mine, but let me be a Jew .     . . " He writes the poem to evoke compassion for the Jews and make     others aware of their hardships and injustices. "Only then can I call     myself Russian." (lines 66-67). The poet writes of a future time when     the Russian people realize that the Jews are people as well accept     them as such. If you hate the Jews, he asks, why not hate me as well?     True peace and unity will only occur when they have accepted everyone,     including the Jews.             Stanza I describes the forest of Babi Yar, a ravine on the     outskirts of Kiev. It was the site of the Nazi massacre of more than    thirty thousand Russian Jews on September 29-30, 1941. There is no     memorial to the thirty thousand, but fear pervades the area. Fear that     such a thing could occur at the hands of other humans. The poet feels     the persecution and pain and fear of the Jews who stood there in this     place of horror. Yevtushenko makes himself an Israelite slave of Egypt     and a martyr who died for the sake of his religion. In lines 7-8, he     claims that he still bars the marks of the persecution of the past.     There is still terrible persecution of the Jews in present times     because of their religion. These lines serve as the transition from     the Biblical and ancient examples he gives to the allusions of more     recent acts of hatred. The lines also allude to the fact that these     Russian Jews who were murdered at Babi Yar were martyrs as well.              The next ezza reminds us of another event in Jewish history     where a Jew was persecuted solely because of his religious beliefs.     The poet refers to the "pettiness" (line 11) of anti-Semitism as the     cause of Dreyfus' imprisonment. Anti-Semitism is his "betrayer" (line     12) when he is framed, and anti-Semitism is his "judge" (line 12) when     he is wrongly found guilty. Lines 13-14 claim that even the fine and     supposedly civilized women of society shun Dreyfus because he is a Jew     and fear him like they would fear an animal.              In ezza III, Yevtushenko brings himself to the midst of the     					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.